Categories: NewsNJ DOEState

Does Montague Need a Geography Lesson?

The New Jersey Herald is reporting on a bizarre situation in the Sussex County school district of Montague where parents are complaining that the district is breaking the law in serving their special education children. Montague is a K-6th grade, 285-student district that only sends its special needs kids to either Port Jervis High School or Orange-Ulster BOCES in Goshen, both in New York State, in spite of the fact that placement of children with disabilities is supposed to be dictated by necessary services outlined in Individualized Education Plans. On the other hand, all their non-disabled kids go to Port Jervis too. The article lists several allegations of violations of I.D.E.A. such as Montague refusing to allow independent evaluations, ruling out other placements even when Port Jervis or BOCES didn’t provide I.E.P.-mandated services, and making placements without parental consent. Now parents are contemplating a class action suit while a website called Montague Buzz has been started to rally the troops.

The Montague situation has a complex history. In a series of letters in 2003 and 2004 between then-Education Commissioner William Librera and the Director Office of Special Education Programs Stephanie Lee Smith there’s a fair amount of back-and-forth over whether special ed Montague students placed in New York State retain their rights to due process in New Jersey. At one point, Smith gripes in a letter dated May 26th, 2004,

Your response appears, on the one hand, to assume that the NJDOE can relinquish its responsibility for general supervision of education programs for children with disabilities living in New Jersey, but attending a school in New York, to New York, while at the same time arguing that NJDOE treats Port Jervis “as it would any receiving school in New Jersey,” noting the application of New Jersey regulations to “receiving schools” and the responsibilities of “district boards of education” (defined as the school district of residence by 6A:14-1.3) for the education of children placed in ‘receiving schools.’ Frankly, we are unable to see how these two concepts can be reconciled.

Who’s running the shop there?

Laura Waters

Recent Posts

BREAKING: Statement from JerseyCAN on State’s Long-Delayed Release of Student Test Results

This is a statement by Paula White, Executive Director of JerseyCAN, on the New Jersey…

2 years ago

NJEA: Murphy’s Elimination of Teacher Performance Test Is a Major Win for Students and Educators

This is a press release. Earlier today, Gov. Phil Murphy signed a bill to eliminate…

2 years ago

Murphy Signs Bill Eliminating EdTPA Test for Teacher Certification

Today Gov. Phil Murphy signed Senate Bill 896, which prohibits the New Jersey Department of…

2 years ago

LILLEY: Blue States Had More School Closures and More Learning Loss — Just Like NJ under Gov. Murphy

The 74 conducted a study of the relative learning loss in Democratic (Blue) and Republican (Red) states and…

2 years ago

One of Newark Superintendent’s New High Schools Tolerates Racism Against Black Students

In October 2020 Newark Superintendent Roger Leon announced with great fanfare the opening of district’s…

2 years ago