NJ Education Report

The fact is that the statement to which you object is, for the most part true (not to be construed as a Corzine endorsement by any stretch). It does indeed depend on your preference set for what goes into better quality of life. But, NJ's investment in schools does differentiate it from other states - on quality as well as spending (and on gaps in quality relative to similar states that don't invest in poor communities - like CT which invests in only a few).

Here's a quick rundown on research on whether school funding reforms positively affect student outcomes:

http://schoolfinance101.wordpress.com/2009/05/29/do-school-finance-reforms-make-any-difference/

Here's a quick rundown on a recent study of the positive effects of Abbott reforms:

http://schoolfinance101.wordpress.com/2009/10/12/real-info-re-nj-and-abbott-districts/

And finally, here's my take on the usual spin about "business friendly" (low tax) states and school quality:

http://schoolfinance101.wordpress.com/2008/12/17/state-rankings-small-businesses-school-quality-and-economic-productivity/

This is not to say that we should not try to figure out ways to get even better bang for our buck in NJ. You certainly know where I stand on consolidation/ reorganization issues, or that we should not try to create greater options for kids stuck in the poorest neighborhoods and schools, though charters are an inconsistent option (break even at average) at best in NJ for now.

Cheers!