November School Board Elections Moves Forward

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest
Share on facebook
Share on twitter

As the New Jersey State Legislature’s lame duck session limps to a close, two education bills have a shot at passage on Monday: A 4394, which would give school boards and communities the option of moving elections to November, and the Urban Hope Act.

The first bill has been effectively tweaked, per efforts by the NJ School Boards Association. In its original form the legislation allowed for three different groups to move elections from April to November: the local school board, 15% of the community, or the municipal government officials. This last version (here’s a press release) eliminates the prerogative of town councils.

NJSBA also wanted to separate two parts of the bill: the part that eliminated school budget votes if the proposed budget came in under the 2% cap, and the part that moved the election of school board members to November (during the general election). That separation didn’t fly, however, and Gov. Christie probably wouldn’t have signed it anyway. As currently written, it’s a matter of whether school boards are enticed enough by the carrot –- no budget votes! – to accept the stick – November elections that are less easily controlled and will garner a higher turnout.

One of the co-sponsors of the bill, Assemblyman Lou Greenwald, said,

Politicians and pundits have talked about doing this for years, but special interests and inertia have prevented progress on this important issue–until today. Empowering towns to move their school elections to November will give voters better control of their local finances while saving property taxpayers the costs of holding yet another local election.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on pinterest
Pinterest

1 Comment

  • kallikak, January 7, 2012 @ 12:11 am Reply

    You've got it wrong:

    The press release says muni councils can vote through the change.

    This bill will have two likely consequences: (1) 2% tax increases will become the default for converting boards, regardless of district needs; and (2) converting boards will quickly be captured by local partisan organizations.

    For a Trenton lifer like Lou Greenwald, this represents “progress”. For the rest of us, it's the end of independent school boards as we now know them.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *