“Neuromyths” in Education

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest
Share on facebook
Share on twitter

Paul A. Howard Jones in ”Neuroscience and Education: Myths and Messages”  describes the neuromyths that have leaked into teacher education schools and the teaching corps.. (Neuromyth: “a misconception generated by a misunderstanding, a misreading or a misquoting of facts scientifically established [by brain research] to make a case for use of brain research in education and other contexts.”) Dr. Howard further describes neuromyths as stemming from “uninformed interpretations of genuine scientific facts [that] are promoted by victims of their own wishful thinking.”

online pharmacy purchase metformin online no prescription

The paper gets pretty technical, but relevant here is the prevalence of neuromyths among teachers. The paper includes a chart of the percentage of teachers from the U.K., the Netherlands, Turkey, Greece, and China who believe in these misconceptions of the way students learn. It’s a pretty fair guess that these that many U.S. teachers, as well as much of the public, fall for these myths too.

Here’s a few education neuromyths:

  • We mostly only use 10% of our brain.
  • Individuals learn better when they receive information in their preferred learning style (for example, visual, auditory, and kinesthetic).
  • Short bouts of co-ordination exercises can improve integration of left and right hemispheric brain function.
  • Differences in hemispheric dominance (left brain or right) can explain individual differences among learners.
  • Children are less attentive after sugary drinks and snacks.

online pharmacy sildalis for sale no prescription pharmacy
Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on pinterest
Pinterest

3 Comments

  • kallikak, October 20, 2014 @ 5:40 pm Reply

    You left out a big one:

    The typical 'plastic' brain, whose synaptic networks are constantly adapting to accommodate anticipated workload, can SIMULTANEOUSLY become more effective at both critical thinking (i.e., slow, content-rich reading followed by contemplative and complex thought) and hyper-digital activity (i.e., bombardment with many relatively shallow messages of uncertain quality delivered over multiple media).

    Oh, by the way, this neuromyth—our students can have it all, simultaneously—underpins the CCSS.

  • NJ Left Behind, October 21, 2014 @ 11:30 am Reply

    Well, the researchers left out a big one. I was just listing their findings. But well-played, sir.

  • kallikak, October 22, 2014 @ 2:46 pm Reply

    Recommended reading: The Shallows by Nicholas Carr

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *