Remote learning during the pandemic has indeed taken its toll on NJ students.
The New Jersey Globe reported that based on interim tests 37% of NJ students were below grade level in language arts and math. What is even more alarming is that more than half of Black and Hispanic students were below grade level for both subjects. More than half! As Senate Education Committee Chairwoman Theresa Ruiz said: ” This is a crisis.”
Of course, the NJ Department of Education is using “interim” tests because the state cancelled NJ’s annual student testing at the urging of the NJEA. As the NJEA stated in its June NJEA Review (p. 11), “In large part due to the advocacy of our members, New Jersey announced … that it would be seeking a waiver from USDOE. Members wrote over 15,000 letters in support of the waiver application, urging the federal government to grant that request.” The NJEA also “advocated with members of the state and federal legislatures.” The facts show that the NJEA worked very hard to have the annual tests cancelled.
The NJEA claimed that cancelling the annual tests was a “significant benefit” for students because they did not have to undergo “[r]ote ‘test-prep.’” The NJEA is also advocating for “much less time-consuming and labor-intensive” annual tests called Start Strong that are to be given this fall as a replacement for the old annual tests.
Sunlight draws three conclusions from these facts:
We know that the NJEA led a statewide opt-out campaign against the old tests (then called PARCC, now called New Jersey Student Learning Assessment), and now it wants to replace them with a new, less demanding test. But the reason the NJEA fought against the old tests was that they were used in teacher evaluations, not because they were a poor measure of student learning. In other words, the NJEA’s main concern was for its members and not the students.
The NJEA’s pushing for the cancellation of annual exams in the spring and for new, less demanding annual tests this fall should be seen in this light. Is the NJEA’s first concern the students or its members? Does the NJEA really want to determine the extent of the learning loss? Or does the NJEA want to avoid the truth when it comes to the consequences of its push for remote learning?
For the NJEA’s talk about equity and social justice, the NJEA appears uninterested in determining the extent of learning loss during the pandemic, which we know was worse for minority and low-income students. The bottom line for NJ parents and students is that once again the teachers union appears to be looking out for its own interests, not theirs.
This is a statement by Paula White, Executive Director of JerseyCAN, on the New Jersey…
This is a press release. Earlier today, Gov. Phil Murphy signed a bill to eliminate…
Today Gov. Phil Murphy signed Senate Bill 896, which prohibits the New Jersey Department of…
The 74 conducted a study of the relative learning loss in Democratic (Blue) and Republican (Red) states and…
In October 2020 Newark Superintendent Roger Leon announced with great fanfare the opening of district’s…
This is a press release from the Governor's Office. In related news, one in five…